On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 at 04:24:49, Xyne wrote: > > The intent of the first sectionm before the "OR", is to measure any sort of > > activity. Updating a package, voting or posting a comment shows that the TU > > is still logging in to the AUR and thus active in some sense. The point of > > the first section was to provide a way to remove TUs who had simply > > disappeared. This is as it should be. There is no mandated TU quota for > > package actions. > > > The intent of the second section, after the "OR", is to ensure that TUs who > > repeatedly disregard votes and possibly prevent quorum from being > > established > > can be removed. > > The special removal procedure was only added to handle special cases where the > TU has clearly abandoned Arch altogether (no detectable activity in the last > two months) or the TU has simply ignored votes and thus jeopardized quorum, > again over a period of two months or more. > > The normal procedure should be used to remove a TU who has not impeded other > TUs in their mission and who has been active within the last two months, which > gives them time to offer an explanation or a resignation.
So you suggest to remove the first part of the condition (before the "OR") altogether?
