On Wed 30 May 2018 at 14:31, Jagannathan Tiruvallur Eachambadi via aur-general <aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> License in at least one of package is wrong. I haven't checked the > others but if they are generated by your script you might want to look > into it. In r-tidyverse, license is specified as "GPL-3 | file > LICENSE" which doesn't exists. > > Instead of "license=('GPL-3 | file LICENSE')" use "license=('GPL3' > 'custom')" if there are other custom licenses involved. "license" in > the PKGBUILD is an array so each license has to be specified > separately. Thanks. I've been meaning to look into this. I'm pretty sure that "GPL-3 or file LICENSE" just means GPL3 for most of them, but that they also bundle the GPL file. That's the case for r-tidyverse, for example. I just need to come up with a way to check it for the other 12,500 packages. > Also consider adopting the r-cran-* packages or ask the maitainers to > convert them to r-$modulename since it will be consistant with what > was discussed earlier. I've adopted some that were very outdated and renamed them already. I'll email the other maintainers to see if they'll rename.