On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 18:09:50 +0000 Maksim Fomin via aur-general <[email protected]> wrote:
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > On Friday, October 26, 2018 8:23 PM, Doug Newgard via aur-general > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > You did thank Felix, but then went on to make your true intent extremely > > clear. > > You specifically ask why your packages were moved (there doesn't have to be > > a > > reason), and say things like: > > > > "The reason I'm asking is because over the years I've added and been > > maintaining some professional software and these packages are part of that > > chain. Colleagues in the field have become accustomed to me for packaging > > with care and updating with new features." > > > > The aforementioned thanks would appear to be perfunctory, like saying "No > > offense, but you're an idiot". > > > > Reference: > > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2018-September/034279.html > > > > I see no such attitude. After reading this and previous thread the quote > above expresses what happened quite neutrally: AUR package was used by group > of people, after moving package to community, some things (important to that > group) became broken - presumably because of some changes in community > package. There is nothing wrong in telling that one person was maintaining > package and his colleagues became accustomed to that package. Except there was nothing wrong with the packages in Community, nothing had broken.
