On 11/04/18 at 01:37am, shoober420 via aur-general wrote: > I already did. I showed an example of how I contributed, and I already have > two packages I was able to update and maintain. There would have been many > more if I wasn't suspended for no good reason.
The reason was given here already, i.e. making (seemingly) bogus requests. I guess marking inactive should also ask for a reason in the future and mail that to the inactivee. That's something which I believe does not exists yet. > You blindly assuming I didn't contact the maintainer, then denying my > request TWICE, not giving a reason TWICE, instead of actually discussing it > with me why you denied my maintainership is not actually a reason to deny > my request. Since you didn't explicitly claim why you denied it, having two > times to do so, taunting me to request it again, technically is no reason > to deny someones request. As said before, it's common to first flag it out of date, wait for results and then orphan it. > Not only was no reason given to denying my request to maintain sdl2-hg, you > gave no reason for suspending my account. FYI, "sdl2-hg" and > "lib32-sdl2-hg" were both maintained by the same guy, so if you just handed > over maintainership to me for "lib32-sdl2-hg" in a blink of an eye, there's > no reason to do the same for "sdl2-hg", considering it was the same > maintainer, and all the reasons I mentioned before, especcially the comment > from "Teteros". Different TU's accept AUR requests, and respond differently to requests such as "Yo I got this my dude". Anyway please take a deep breath, calm down and refrain from re-iterating already mentioned statements. If you don't calm down, I will moderate you here, since this discussion is not going anywhere. > This all in all, is completely unprofessional, and for some of you to judge > me and my actions...maybe you all should look at yourselfs before even > considering judging me. It's hard not to judge if you keep making/re-iterating the topic instead of calming down. And asking in a friendly manner if your account can be activated again. -- Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
