On 12/10/18 11:54 AM, Storm Dragon via aur-general wrote: > So just to make sure, this all boils down to, this shouldn't be a split > package, and the probablem with taholafs should be solved by that > package maintainer instead of depending on me? Would it be ok to unsplit > the package and go back to a python3 only distribution now?
If taholafs requires the ability to "import wormhole" in a python2
program, then it is fine to provide a split package.
However, the split python2 package should only contain the library
module, and should rm -rf "${pkgdir}"/usr/bin
...
Is taholafs not in the AUR? There are no AUR packages which depend on
magic-wormhole, and I cannot find anything when searching for "taholafs".
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
