On 2020-03-01 18:59, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 3/1/20 12:56 PM, Frederick Zhang via aur-general wrote:
>> Sorry please ignore my last comment since apparently it was replaced by
>> anydesk-debian [1].
>>
>> [1] 
>> https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2020-February/037952.html
> This... doesn't even make much sense at all. What is the point of having
> so many packages for the same thing?

The difference between anydesk-bin and anydesk-debian is that the latter
uses a custom version of pango because the most recent one seems to
cause issues for some people, see the package comments.

At the time of accepting PRQ#18092, I thought that the binary from the
Debian package was built differently than the one provided by the
.tar.gz file, but that is actually not the case apparently, so
"anydesk-debian" might not be the most fitting name.

Since upstream is closed source, the package anydesk-bin using  system
pango could now be renamed to "anydesk".

Best,
Jonas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to