On 5/16/20 10:48 PM, Markus Schaaf wrote: > Am 16.05.20 um 21:01 schrieb Levente Polyak via aur-general: > >> - shouldn't this package be named exfat-nofuse-dkms-git ? its not > > Why would a fuse-filesystem use dkms? The whole purpose of fuse is to > run in user space. And renaming packages is an annoyance. > > Just my 2¢, as a user of this package. > > BR >
What exactly do you mean? I'm talking about the exfat-dkms-git packages, which in fact already uses dkms. I'm pretty sure you confuse something here. And the name is in fact wrong, as its exfat-nofuse git package using dkms, hence its name should be exfat-nofuse-dkms-git. In general it doesn't matter much if renaming is annoyance, what matter is if the name is correct or wrong. cheers, Levente
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
