I think the patch in question has been reduced to only modifying the version 16 hours ago, before that it did a bit more than that[1]. But I guess, in the current state[2], it should be acceptable?
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=noisetorch&id=0d0edebd66b95ca9eb2ed3775698f4cf1a145145 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/main.patch?h=noisetorch Am Mo., 17. Mai 2021 um 15:40 Uhr schrieb Doug Newgard via aur-general < [email protected]>: > On Mon, 17 May 2021 13:32:26 +0000 > lawl via aur-general <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello > > > > I'm the developer of NoiseTorch (https://github.com/lawl/NoiseTorch/). > > I faithfully believe that the package "noisetorch" in the ArchLinux User > Repository ("AUR") (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/noisetorch/) > violates my license (GPLv3). > > > > I have the asked previous maintainer of this package to not apply > patches or make it clear that this is a fork that's being conveyed. Several > Arch Linux trusted users were also informed of this: > https://github.com/lawl/NoiseTorch/issues/2#issuecomment-785262068 > > > > The "patches" you're talking about are those to apply the correct version > for > packaging? There's no way any reasonable person would find that violates > the > licensing. >
