On 24/05/2021 15:05, Manhong Dai wrote:
On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 14:11 +0200, alad via aur-general wrote:
On 24/05/2021 13:43, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
Who is this about? The noisetorch software, or the sge software?
And
what even is this???
...
The orginal discussion was already concluded with [1]. The ongoing
discussion of sge, initiated by Manhong, is completely unrelated and
nothing but spam.
So indeed, everyone's time is wasted.
If it is 'spam', why did quite some people reply? and why did a few
even support my understanding about copyright? Do you think all of
those replied are not able tell 'spam' from discussion?
This discussion was about noisetorch. You turned it into a discussion of
copyright in general, based on your slights with the sge package.
Replies or not, aur-general is *not* the place for that. There are
plenty of mailing lists where legal topics can be discussed instead,
such as license-discuss. [1]
So, please, take it to one of those.
Alad
[1]
https://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
Alad
[1]
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2021-May/036236.html
