On 25/05/2021 18:58, Antoine Viallon via aur-general wrote:
25 mai 2021 16:42 "Genes Lists via aur-general"
<[email protected]> a écrit:
As an outside observer of this thread, it seems like the time for discussion is
over. This talk
appears to center largely about opinions on civil litigation.
Actually, this discussion could be important if the responsability of Arch
could potentially be involved.
Nobody wants the Arch project to be sued or to be liable in some way or another.
...and, as I said already, it was long established that Arch is not
liable or involved in any way.
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2021-May/036236.html
But sure, let's keep talking about ways to obscure trivial patches to
mitigate phantom copyright claims. I mean, really?
Alad
aviallon
