On 21/07/27 13:17, Archange wrote: > systemd is not part of base-devel, and base is not part of official building > chroots (they were reasons for this, but I don’t remember them at the > moment). If you remind yourself please let us know.
> Also, I would still keep base content in dependencies (when required) in any > case, because we could drop packages from base at any point (they are open > tickets for some of them already). A lesson for me too, as I always use implicit base dependencies in my packages. An assumption that never caused me trouble, but it doesn't mean it won't in the future. Thanks! Marcin Wieczorek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
