On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 08:15 +0000, paul.mirkwood wrote: > I'm not sure whether this is intended as a joke
Hi, my apologies for the bad satire. Is there a rational for naming packages "golang-golang-"* ? Probably naming packages just "go-"* is suboptimal, but actually the language is called "Go" and not "GoLang", let alone "GoLang-GoLang", https://archlinux.org/packages/?sort=&q=golang-golang&maintainer=&flagged= . Regards, Ralf
