On 1/22/24 00:47, Aaron Liu wrote:
Changing the license does indeed change the package, as it means that different license files are installed, though I'm not sure whether that warrants bumping the pkgrel,Here it is not question of changing the license but simply switching the current license to SPDX identifiers [1] in the license array. The installed license files (if there are) are not changed. So, unless the license itself changed, simply switching to an SPDX identifier as Mark Wagie did does not change the package and I think it's fine not bumping the pkgrel _just_ for that.
and spamming the same comment across several packages by the same maintainer is certainly disruptive. That said, I've only seen one comment by them, and I have not seen any other valid complaints about xiota. Could you link to the other pkgbases they've commented on?I'm gonna remove "cluttering" comments from the package listed in Mark Wagie's initial mail.
For what it's worth, the ML guidelines also include to quote parts of the email you're responding to [2]. It's better to be able to respond to both you and Mark in the same email :)Also, welcome to the aur-general mailing list! Familiarize yourself with [the mailing list guidelines][1]. Highlights include using plain text emails.
[1]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/General_guidelines#Mailing_lists
[1] https://spdx.org/licenses/ [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/General_guidelines#Quoting -- Regards, Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
