On Friday, July 26th, 2024 at 9:13 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos 
<artafi...@archlinux.org> wrote:

> Good luck on the application

Thanks!

> You are maintaining podman-desktop-bin. We rarely package binary
> packages if we can build the ones from source. Do you plan to build from
> source this?

Yes, it's already existing in the AUR as a source package. I'm just maintaining 
the -bin one to avoid build times that can be lengthy on this package, and I 
want to integrate podman-desktop into the AUR because I feel it would be a nice 
addition to the podman tools already present in extra.

> > I also plan to merge my zaproxy-desktop package with zaproxy that is 
> > already in extra.
> 

> This is just an icon and a .desktop file - you can raise an MR already
> for it.

You're right. I opened it here: 
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/zaproxy/-/merge_requests/1

> > python-stegoveritas
> 

> 

> The PKGBUILD seems to not follow the python packages guidelines [1]

Thanks for the info. I'll fix the source and the other little things that are 
wrong.

> > |recon-ng
> 

> |
> 

> This [2] is slightly confusing. It adds no value as far as I can tell as
> it doesn't change the default behaviour. Can you elaborate a bit on why
> this patch is needed?

As kpcyrd said, this patch removes tracking that is enabled by default in 
upstream. I left it because I agree with the goal of the patch. More generally, 
it seems that the developer of recon-ng switched to a rolling-release model, 
making this package obsolete. It is still working but will probably not be 
updated anymore, and I'm considering to remove it and replace it by a -git 
package. 


> > python-spark-parser
> 

> 

> This seems weird PKGBUILD. Using a split pattern for a non split package
> and not following python guidelines [1]

Indeed, this package was originally splitted, but I remove the deprecated 
python2 subpackage and I missed some cleaning. I'll fix that too.

Thanks for your feedbacks!

Cheers 


Quentin 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to