El mar, 30-09-2025 a las 12:08 +0200, Dennis Herbrich escribió: > I've reproduced the issue [..]
Thank you both very much for your analysis. It is clear that the problem arises in the iteration of systemd-nspawn and go, but as you rightly point out, it is not clear which of the two should solve it. Let's see if someone with more knowledge can give us a hand. > The (somewhat sketchy) workaround I gave in my initial mail > still stands though (while waiting for this systemd-nspawn + go > process handling issue to be solved). I'll have to check it out, but it could be a good workaround in the meantime. > Good luck, anyone else! Thanks again! -- Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://ogarcia.me
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
