El dom, 08-02-2026 a las 20:22 -0300, Fermín Olaiz escribió: > Hey [..]
Hi! > > I'm making [..] `thrive-app` and > `thrive-cli`. The names you have chosen are perfectly acceptable; I don't see any problem with them. They are descriptive and avoid conflict. > > In any case, with a growing number of packages in the AUR, it would > be > reasonable to think this kind of things will happen more frequently. > > Is there any guideline or ideas for this? Should a discussion (maybe > RFC) be started? > This is not really necessary, as conflicts over names have existed since the dawn of time. When this happens, the second party generally has to adapt their name in an imaginative way to avoid having the same name. From there, if over time the original package disappears (or becomes irrelevant) and the new package becomes much more relevant, the new package may adapt the original name, but this is something that only happens over time and in a natural, organic way. In short, I don't think it's necessary to complicate things. > Thanks! You're welcome! -- Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://ogarcia.me
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
