Hello


Having to locally download files shouldn't be breaking behavior for
a user when using AUR Packages as best practice expects the user to
confront themselves with the content of the PKGBUILD anyway. This
includes to take notice of additional requirements such as the file
that is locally required. One can expect so much effort to put in
by the user.
Well, the AUR package is still supposed to be a package right? I feel
like the fact that users should read a pkgbuild isn't an excuse to
insert additional friction into the package. AUR packages are supposed
to have some utility, otherwise they wouldn't exist.


The main difference between running the installer from Blackmagic website is pacman will be able to track the files in your system, including, but not only, updating the versions and remove the package in the case is not needed anymore.


However, using the package from AUR is not a strict requirement. If so many people have been complaining for a year about the removal of direct downloads from the Blackmagic website, they should seriously consider other alternatives.


Sufficient reasons and explanations have been provided, and this thread has added nothing more than what has already been written over the past year. I’ve already provided far too many explanations (and endured far too many insults) regarding this package, and I won’t offer any further arguments about this topic.



What I would suggest is that someone with “clout” in the Arch Linux
community (at least someone with an `@archlinux.org` email address) get
in touch with Blackmagic Design and explain the situation
+1. Alternately maybe it can be Muflone who writes the email, but in
general I think this is a good idea.


AUR is not officially supported by Arch Linux, and no packages on AUR can be sponsored by Arch Linux or are part of the Arch Linux project. Since I do not intend to move DaVinci Resolve and DaVinci Resolve Studio packages to the official Arch Linux repositories, I will not be sending any official requests to Blackmagic, either via my @archlinux.org email address or my personal email addresses.


Best regards


--
Muflone

Reply via email to