The tone has changed. This distorts the significance of stable, release- based non-CVS packages compared to CVS packages. I have no idea how to respond to this:
" morsmortium commented on 2026-09-27 11:02 (UTC) I will not argue this anymore. Someone having a crash and losing work is a larger annoyance than someone having to do a 5 second rebuild, and this happened at times. It will get reduced over time, when the library will become more stable. If you think this is so large of a violation of the guidelines, you are free to send an orphan/adoption request and make Arch staff decide it." - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-nocsd-git
