Campbell Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey, > > Don't paste unfiltered LLM output on the mailing list, please. If WebDawg > wanted to read slop, they would have gotten it themselves.
The text he pasted was stated as an LLM product, and had references which looks to me in place. I hope it is reasonbly correct. For example, I think it adheres to Debian Responsible Use of Generative AI resolution[1]. It can be he posted it here for others to read, and possibly reply. Not just for WebDawg. If I am to decide, his message is acceptable. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2026/08/msg00005.html?pow_referer=https%3A%2F%2Fduckduckgo.com%2F > If WebDawg > wanted to read slop, they would have gotten it themselves. > > Campbell > > > On October 15, 2026 6:41:16 PM EDT, Olav Seyfarth > <[email protected]> wrote: > >A Claude summary: > > > >The AUR is run by the "Package Maintainers" (formerly "Trusted Users"), who > >are official Arch staff [1]. Their governance is written down in the Package > >Maintainer Bylaws [2]. The bylaws set out the group's mission, which > >includes maintaining, managing and watching over the operation of the AUR. > >They also set out the voting procedures, for example for new members and for > >amending the bylaws themselves. Amendments are proposed on aur-general. > > > >Changes that affect Arch as a whole go through the RFC process [3]. > >For day-to-day rules, see the AUR submission guidelines [4]. > > > >[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Package_Maintainers > >[2] https://package-maintainer-bylaws.aur.archlinux.org/ > >[3] https://rfc.archlinux.page/ > >[4] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines > >
