On 24/10/2026 13:34, Andreas Røsdal wrote:
lør. 24. okt. 2026, 13:26 skrev Iyán Méndez Veiga <[email protected]>:
I just fail to see what is the main motivation here? Why not support and
improve already existing web browsers outside of your "duopoly" with
already more developers and users?



There is a multitude of motivations. To increase the multitude of web
browser variants available, to develop a new web browser from scratch in
2026; using state of the art technology, reduce technical debt in the
codebase, quick compilation, small maintainable source code, a real web
browser developed in Europe (Chrome, Safari, Firefox is domainated and
controlled by USA), we are also seeking funds from NLnet restack so that
developers in Europe can learn about making web browsers), security (No
JIT), I could go on and on.

Oh, I see... I could also go on and on about this, but I won't. Just one quick remark: you want to be "100% Europe" and avoid USA, yet even the minimalist version depends on libraries from Google [1, 2] and the default search engine is DuckDuckGo [3], a US company. This is not to say that I agree with your goal, but to show that you are already inconsistent.

Going back to the main topic. Registration to AUR is closed, and there will be no manual registrations as mentioned a few times on this list. So I guess you just have to wait and see, and once registrations are open you can submit your PKGBUILD. I will not use it, though, and I would encourage any user who cares about security to avoid it, too. At least for now.

Cheers,
Iyán
[1]: https://github.com/nordstjernen-web/northstar-web-browser/tree/main/subprojects/wuffs
[2]: https://github.com/google/wuffs
[3]: https://github.com/nordstjernen-web/northstar-web-browser/blob/5fe7100d7b657efbef328cdfa946f392fc4b0c0d/src/config.c#L157


--
Iyán Méndez Veiga
GPG Key: 204C 461F BA8C 81D1 0327  E647 422E 3694 311E 5AC1

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to