On Sunday 17 August 2014 at 11:18:25, Martti Kühne wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 7:39 AM, carstene1ns <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Package maintainer was a TU and he even re-uploaded the package now. > > Who is at fault here? FredBezies for requesting? foutrelis for deleting? > > keenerd for maintaining and re-uploading? > > > > > just to bring it up: ...or google for threading all "request accepted" > and "request declined" emails. can't we use the same subject > (thread-id?) as the respective request? that would provide a more > sensible grouping in whatever email browser you're using... > > cheers! > mar77i
The In-Reply-To: header seems to be correctly set on automated emails. Apparently it's gmail web interface to blame. -- Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx /
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
