On Monday 18 August 2014 10:43:21 [email protected] wrote: > jamesan [1] filed a request to merge xcursor-oxygen-neon [2] into > xcursor-oxy-neon [3]: > > Packages build the same target except this one references an opaque > dropbox tarball and broken upstream URL. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/jamesan/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/xcursor-oxygen-neon/ > [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/xcursor-oxy-neon/
As far as I understand according to the page [1] the correct name is xcursor- oxygen-neon. But this package isn't updated since 2012 unlike xcursor-oxy-neon which is well maintained. I think we should merge xcursor-oxy-neo into xcursor-oxygen-neon and then we disown xcursor-oxygen-neon (now, since dynamo looks an inactive, or over disown request). I'm CCing this message to the xcursor-oxy-neon maintainer. 1. http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Oxygen+Neon?content=137109 -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: [email protected] ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
