I take the high-jacking allegation back. It was improper of me and I apologise.
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:44:17 -0500 Jake Daffer <[email protected]> wrote: > I am ok with the deletion. But I want to be clear that this is not > from git and this is from the website that is the host of the > package. And let me also be clear that the claim of a high-jacking > attempt has no basis in its aligation. Also my claim as to why I am > felt that GordonGR's packgage is from git is because it is using a > specific commit. Which is understandably a saved state of a git > development, but this does mean that it is still from git. Next time > ask me about this because the PKGBUILD's are different. > > On 10/29/14 08:07, [email protected] wrote: > > GordonGR [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-rtmpdump-stable [2]: > > > > This package is duplicate of aur/lib32-rtmpdump [a], maintained by > > me. Its creator claims (in the comments section of [a]), that his > > package is stable while mine is the developmental edition, which is > > not true; the package in [extra] [b] uses git, and therefore [a] > > mine uses git as well. The same practice is used for other > > packages, eg the old now gstreamer0.10 packages. There is simply no > > place for this package, I would go insofar as to say this is > > high-jacking attempt. Please delete. > > > > [a] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-rtmpdump/ > > [b] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/rtmpdump/ > > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/GordonGR/ > > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lib32-rtmpdump-stable/ > > > -- Νῖκος Θεοδώρου «Ἀγεωμέτρητος μηδεὶς εἰσίτω!»
