Hi all, This request has been rejected by Muflone, and I don't quite understand; is there a reason to keep these packages around? I'm pretty sure my packages in the AUR have been superseded by Laurent Carlier's (lcarlier/lordheavy) in [extra], and can only confuse users.
Cheers, Eric On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:45 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > 1ace [1] filed a deletion request for vulkan [2]: > > extra/vulkan-sdk & extra/vulkan-icd-loader replace these vulkan-sdk & > vulkan-loader. > > Not sure what to do about the different name though; should I push an > update with the new name (vulkan-icd-loader) and `replaces=(vulkan- > loader)` to make those who installed my package use the new name, and > in a week (when hopefully people have upgraded to the new name) > actually delete this one? > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/1ace/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vulkan/ >
