Is this standardised convention? Happy to switch mine to compiling from source if so.
On Sunday, 28 February 2016 16:13:36 GMT Jameson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:30 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > > tjbp [1] filed a deletion request for shashlik-bin [2]: > > > > This package already exists under "shashlik". Could do with a > > shashlik-git package, however. > > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tjbp/ > > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/shashlik-bin/ > > If we remove my -bin package, shashlik should be renamed since it is built > from a binary package, and not source. > > Thanks, > Jameson.
