Hi naund, hi all,
fordprefect here.
I see your argument and appreciate your effort to clean up, but after a
short check in the AUR, the prevailing naming scheme seems to be
r-cran-$modulename not r-$modulename.
I would follow the argument to rename all packages to cran-$modulename,
since cran (Comprehensive R Archive Network) contains the R reference
already, but omitting cran in the package name is not a good choice in
my opinion.
I regard r-curl as a duplicate of r-cran-curl and suggest merging the
other way around. If you like, you can take the ownership of the
package. That should not hinder a sensible solution here.
Best
Georg
Am 09.07.2017 um 00:11 schrieb [email protected]:
naund [1] filed a request to merge r-cran-curl [2] into r-curl [3]:
Both providing the same content and generating dependency problems.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/naund/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/r-cran-curl/
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/r-curl/
