On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:17:13PM +0000, Max Liebkies wrote: > Please do not delete [0] the package as the upstream discussion [1] about > whether to keep a separate `dotnet` package as a meta package hasn't been > concluded yet. > > Kind regards, > @gegenschall > --- > [0] I am super not sure why a deletion request has been filed if a merge > request would have been what Alad so desired. > [1] https://github.com/dotnet/core-setup/issues/1599 > Same for me if the package is merged to dotnet-runtime or such instead. But keeping a placeholder in the AUR purely for some hypothetical name change - it's not even a valid PKGBUILD to begin with - is misleading at best and doesn't match the submission guidelines. [2]
Alad [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Rules_of_submission > > > VG Max > On 11. Sep 2017, at 21:34, > "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Alad [1] filed a deletion request for dotnet [2]: > > No functionality, not even a package() function - only a depends on a > single AUR package. Merge requests are a thing if you want a different > name. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Alad/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/dotnet/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
