> Duru Can Celasun <[email protected]> hat am 18. Dezember 2017 um 20:25 geschrieben: > > > Nevertheless, I've pushed a new package with the -bin suffix [2]. > However, I'd like to urge everyone to reject this rename request. > Assuming the -oss package renames itself to remove the suffix, it will > cause tremendous confusion among users of the binary package, especially > since the "new" package would have reduced functionality (no extension > gallery) compared to the current binary package. > > As far as I can see, there is no way to use conflicts/replaces in the > PKGBUILD to avoid the above situation. So please, let's not do this. As I mentioned in the comments, this is not sufficient reason to go against AUR package guidelines. In fact, the popularity is even more reason for a package to respect AUR guidelines - as these are commonly used as reference for other packages.
Thanks for submitting the -bin package. I will merge the visual-studio-code package there shortly. Whether the visual-studio-code-oss package should be moved back to visual-studio-code is another topic for discussion. Alad
