On 06/05/2018 10:06 PM, John wrote: > The readme on github is pretty descriptive and well commented and as you > pointed out below
That's irrelevant > the terminology I used is from upstream. You *are* upstream in this case, so that's sort of a weak excuse > I should point out that quite a few pieces of software have less-than-perfect > names :) Go ahead. I don't see how that changes that your programs name is *also* misleading. > It's a niche use I will grant you, but I see the github repo has been starred > by 2 users. I don't think that wide-spread popularity needed for inclusion > in the AUR. Quoting the AUR Rules of submission as taken from the wiki: 'Make sure the package you want to upload is useful. Will anyone else want to use this package? Is it extremely specialized?'. Does that answer your question? -- Rob (coderobe) O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
