Thank you, Eli. That's an interesting example. I've got the idea. Let's the package stay as is.
Have a nice time, Mikhail. пн, 3 сент. 2018 г. в 14:07, Eli Schwartz <[email protected]>: > On 9/3/18 3:25 AM, Felixoid wrote: > > Good day's time Eli and Yen, > > I hope you are well. > > > > First of all, Eli, thank you for the answer. You are right, and it's > > difficult for me to call my own "deprecation way" somehow but "stupid". > > I wasn't happy, of course, about it but didn't mention the proper way > > like "Merge request" one month ago. I'm sorry for it and for that fact > > that it was in AUR for almost a month. > > > > Because of it, I've fixed the package already. > > > > Nevertheless, Yen, polysh package contains not an only script by itself > > but modules in /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/, see [1]. Regarding > > this, I couldn't say, that polysh doesn't provide modules. Moreover, > > when two months ago python was upgraded from 3.6 to 3.7, the package was > > broken without any hints. That's why I've thought that it's a good idea > > to add the prefix. IMHO, it doesn't contradict with [2]. > > Firefox breaks (frequently!) when "icu" is updated. Notwithstanding that > it's a repository package and thusly gets rebuilt on time, does that > mean that it's proper package name should be "icu-firefox" because it > has a binary dependency on the icu package? > Maybe it should even be renamed to > > gtk3-freetype-sqlite3-fontconfig-libjpeg-libvpx-ffmpeg-nss-libpulse-pango-cairo-dbus-firefox? > > Should pacman be renamed to curl-libarchive-pacman? > > Should bash be renamed to readline-bash? > > > > No, that would be silly. > > -- > Eli Schwartz > Bug Wrangler and Trusted User > >
