It definitely would. I was in two minds about whether or not to create a
package that is identical to kdiff3-kf5-git with the only difference being
minor changes to build the latest sources.

If that's what you recommend, I'll create kdiff3-git and mark this for
deletion.

On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 02:45, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Request #13063 has been accepted by eschwartz [1]:
>
> sure, but wouldn't it make more sense to rename it to kdiff3-git?
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/eschwartz/

Reply via email to