On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 14:58:49 +0000, Sauyon Lee wrote: > I'm the maintainer of the gosh package, and this seems reasonable enough to > me, but obviously there's the concern that people who have the old gosh > installed may be using it and not want this to go through (though I doubt > there are many of them).
Thanks for your reply. I too imagine there likely aren't that many of them, and installing Go programs is usually straightforward anyway. > If my input is at all necessary (which I doubt) I'm happy with any decision > from the TUs. I assume there's some kind of protocol for this. It seems like the request was rejected. TUs, is there a protocol for this? The rejection mentioned that minimal activity in early 2017 is enough to keep the package around, so should I file a request again in a few months? I realise that no activity for two years is usually OK for most packages, but with Go having a major release every six months, any Go interpreter that hasn't had updates for more than two releases is likely just unmaintained.
