What is the status of this deletion request? Can we please reject it? Does anything need to change?
On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 11:10 AM Zach Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > The package absolutely does not contain university-specific installation > files. The reason the two linked files contain different hashes is that > they are different versions. Steps to verify this: > 1. Download both RPMs > 2. Extractthe RPM > 3. Open ${srcdir}/opt/f5/vpn/f5vpn in the editor of your choice > 4. Search for the text Version: > 5. Notice that it.emory.edu's RPM is version 7171.2018.0808.1, while > vpn.uts.edu.au's RPM is version 7181.2019.0620.1 > > These RPMs would have been downloaded originally from F5's website by > downloading the APM Clients ISO (latest version is > 7182.2019.923.1603-4727.0) and copying linux_f5vpn.x86_64.rpm. This ISO > does not vary based on who downloads it. > > On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 7:50 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > >> HailHydra [1] filed a deletion request for f5vpn [2]: >> >> Package contains university specific installation files with no >> indication of such in package naming or description. >> The 'linux_f5vpn.x86_64.rpm' file is specific to the university it is >> downloaded from, this can be seen by the differing hash sums of the >> file linked in the PKGBUILD >> ("https://it.emory.edu/vpntools/linux_f5vpn.x86_64.rpm";) and one >> provided by a different university (ie. >> "https://vpn.uts.edu.au/public/download/linux_f5vpn.x86_64.rpm";) >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/HailHydra/ >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/f5vpn/ > >
