oh, I got it. will be careful next time:) пн, 9 мар. 2020 г., 12:59 Jonas Witschel <[email protected]>:
> On 2020-03-09 01:11, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: > > dviktor [1] filed a deletion request for r-gdal [2]: > > > > package name is invalid. the right one is r-rgdal > > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dviktor/ > > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/r-gdal/ > > While I agree with the renames proposed in PRQ#18272 through PRQ#18276, > it is considered good form to bring up such issues in the package > comments first to give the current maintainers a chance to deal with the > rename themselves. > > Given that you have already uploaded fresh packages under the new names > today, I suggest adding the current maintainers of the old packages as > co-maintainers of the new packages: at least some of them appear to be > active, e.g. r-gdal was updated just today. > > Procedurally it would be better to have filed merge requests instead of > deletion requests to merge the old into the new name: this preserves > votes and comments and gives a clearer indication of what happened to > the old package. > > Best regards, > Jonas > >
