Sounds good to me, for what it's worth. —Sam
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, at 16:48, [email protected] wrote: > isfalcantara [1] filed a request to merge ttf-public-sans [2] into > public-sans-font [3]: > > I don't believe that installing TTF, OTF and variable fonts side by > side using a single package is considered good practice. According to > the [font package > guidelines](https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Font_package_guidelines#Package_naming), > the package names must match the font format being installed. I > propose to merge the current package base into public-sans-font, which > is a split package that can provide separate packages for each font > format, following the example of [commissioner- > font](https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/commissioner-font/), showcased > as an [example > package](https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Font_package_guidelines#Example_packages) > in the guidelines. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/isfalcantara/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ttf-public-sans/ > [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/public-sans-font/
