Hi, I saw the normal and -git tag pattern in other packages and followed that approach, but thanks for clarifying about the -bin suffix.
I’ll add a proper description with the next update. I’m just frustrated because it feels like matthewq337 spammed several packages with short, generic deletion requests and then never followed up on them. *_________________________________________________________* *Da4ndo* Software Engineer — Backend & Full‑Stack Developer *Experienced in Rust, TypeScript, **Python, **C #, **C ++ ,**Go, Java* 📄 Portfolio & Blog: https://da4ndo.com 📧 [email protected] a821 <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. aug. 3., V, 11:17): > On Sat, Aug 02, 2025 at 11:37:47PM +0200, Da4ndo wrote: > > Hi matthewq337, > > > > I just read your deletion request for hyde‑ext—and I’m furious. Frankly, > > taking a shot at an AUR package without bothering to fully understand > what > > it is or how it works is irresponsible. > > > > You wrote: > > > > > “a PKGBUILD for someone’s personal dotfiles does not really meet the > > > usefulness criteria of the AUR” > > [...] > > It looks to me, by reading the description, that this installs a list of > "curated" (by whom?) packages and configurations, which for me it's very > personal, by definition. But maybe this is useful for others, I'm not > sure... > > However, the PKGBUILD should build from source and not install a binary > from your repo. The description is missing, and it should declare > depends (I see that it requires an AUR helper [1] at least). > > Some of your other packages have the same problem: they should build > from sources: project-cleaner, hyprproxlock, cengine. > > [1] > https://github.com/Da4ndo/Hyde-Ext/blob/main/src/install/packages.rs#L47 >
