Oh, my mistake. I didn't realise that tee's package now no longer requires pandoc. It would have been helpful if your message had indicated that tbh. I would therefore be in favor of this being merged with wget2 rather than deleted, please. I'll submit a request to that effect. Sorry for the confusion on my end and thanks to tee for maintaining the wget2 PKGBUILD. Mark.
On Tuesday, 14 July 2026 14:17:00 Central European Summer Time Mark Collins wrote: > Hi tee, hi all, > I wonder why you feel there is a duplicate between wget2 and wget2-no-docs? > They do not do the same thing, although both do install wget2, one with > (wget2) and one without (wget2-no-docs) the documentation. The existence of > the latter allows one to install wget2 without the pandoc dependency (and in > turn, its Haskell dependency) that is only needed to build the documentation. > If nobody sees the use from this apart from me then fine, I'll keep using it > on my end, but I do think there is enough of a use case for it to keep it in > the AUR. > Thanks for reading. > Cheers, > Mark > > On Tuesday, 14 July 2026 12:57:20 Central European Summer Time > [email protected] wrote: > > tee [1] filed a deletion request for wget2-no-docs [2]: > > > > duplicate of wget2, this package is now redundant. > > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tee/ > > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wget2-no-docs/ > > > > >
