My bad, I should have checked properly. I looked at "codename-goose-bin" because a user recently brought it up.
I don't think a source build is really needed for the CLI though. Would you be open to renaming "codename-goose-bin" to "goose-cli-bin"? I was thinking about packaging it myself, but since it already exists, I don't think that'd be necessary if it gets renamed. Also, if you don't have much time for it, would you mind adding me as a co/maintainer? On Sat, Jul 11, 2026, 4:33 AM Christopher Cooper <[email protected]> wrote: > codename-goose only packages the CLI. Don't believe the package has > "rebranded to Goose Desktop" - https://goose-docs.ai/ > `goose` is already taken as an AUR package name. That said, they moved > away from the "codename goose" branding, perhaps "goose-cli" would be a > better name. > > In any case this package is definitely neglected, I don't have much time > for it. Happy for whatever AUR mods feel is appropriate. > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2026, at 15:28, [email protected] wrote: > > sheikhlimon [1] filed a request to merge codename-goose [2] into > > goose-desktop [3]: > > > > Upstream rebranded to Goose Desktop. This old package is abandoned and > > out of date. I maintain the active version at goose-desktop. Please > > merge this into goose-desktop to preserve history. > > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/sheikhlimon/ > > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/codename-goose/ > > [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/goose-desktop/ >
