On Wed, 2026-08-12 at 22:47 +0200, Fabio Loli wrote: > Il 12/08/26 18:27, [email protected] ha scritto: > > Request #85604 has been Rejected by bertptrs [1]: > > > > Git reset is unwarranted as it's not much data. Don't do it again. > > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bertptrs/ > > Ok, which is the data quantity that is considerated accettable?
So the data quantity stored was not acceptable to be part of a PKGBUILD, and it shouldn't have been pushed like that. One should not store resources on the AUR, we are not a forge. There is no discussion on that front. On the other hand, this was also not that much data that it warrants an unusual step like git intervention. A simple warning to not do this again suffices in my opinion. There is a non-zero (friction) cost involved with rewriting history so I prefer to not do it too much. Simply committing a delete is fine for me. This is somewhat arbitrary but as long as we're not starting an AUR file store I think we're in the clear. Bert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
