On 2/28/23 04:20, [email protected] wrote:
yochananmarqos [1] filed a deletion request for libinput-light [2]:
Please create a bug report and explain why libwacom is an "unnecessary
dependency" instead of creating a duplicate package with potentially
broken functionality.
"The submitted PKGBUILDs must not build applications already in any of
the official binary repositories under any circumstances. Check the
official package database for the package. If any version of it
exists, do not submit the package. If the official package is out-of-
date, flag it as such. If the official package is broken or is lacking
a feature, then please file a bug report."
--
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Rules_of_submission
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/libinput-light/
No. This is not a duplicate and not a bug. Altered packages (patched or
different build options) are allowed in AUR.
The functionality is not broken. Dependencies are turned off by meson options
provided by original source. So this is perfectly legit way to build it.
