Yes, I saw you revoked it. Thanks! :)
On 29 June 2023 23:15:23 GMT+02:00, Mark Wagie <[email protected]> wrote: > >Yes, you're right. Notice I rejected my deletion request before you replied. ;) > > > >Sent with Proton Mail secure email. > >------- Original Message ------- >On Thursday, June 29th, 2023 at 2:08 PM, Marcell Meszaros ><[email protected]> wrote: > > >> @yochananmarqos, this deletion request is based on mistaken assumptions. >> >> TLDR: It is not hard to create a modified package based on xdg-utils source >> by deleting one script, 'xdg-open', and making the package depend on another >> package that either has an alternative implementation of that script with >> the same name, or a symlink with the same name pointing to another shell >> script that is interface-compatible with the original 'xdg-open'. >> >> For more details, please kindly read the discussion that took place on >> 2023-06-27 on the following page: >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xdg-utils-no-open >> (archived: https://archive.ph/zk7uR) >> >> Ref also owner's merge request [PRQ#43206] from xdg-utils-no-open to >> xdg-utils-custom-open. >> >> Please kindly revoke this ill-conceived deletion request and let @jfrankenau >> implement a viable, Arch-repo-compatible drop-in customization solution for >> xdg-utils that is mostly similar to what Arch's 'xdg-desktop-portal' package >> already utilizes: >> >> https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/xdg-desktop-portal/ >> >> Thank you for your kind cooperation. :) >> >> Marcell (MarsSeed) >> >> On 29 June 2023 21:23:34 GMT+02:00, [email protected] wrote: >> >> > yochananmarqos [1] filed a deletion request for xdg-utils-custom-open >> > [2]: >> > >> > Duplicate of xdg-utils. Custom? How? Open? As opposed to closed? >> > There's also a non-existent dependency on xdg-open-impl--whatever that >> > is. >> > >> > "The submitted PKGBUILDs must not build applications already in any of >> > the official binary repositories under any circumstances. Check the >> > official package database for the package. If any version of it >> > exists, do not submit the package. If the official package is out-of- >> > date, flag it as such. If the official package is broken or is lacking >> > a feature, then please file a bug report." >> > >> > -- >> > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Rules_of_submission >> > >> > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/ >> > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/xdg-utils-custom-open/
