> Earler, owner updated it to 1.0.0 without adjusting the dependencies > accordingly.
Sorry, this is my mistake and not an attempt to reject a previous deletion request. > I don't think it is useful to keep this on AUR. I agree with you. Haven't seen the latest version from extra. Recently I tried to build cherrytree-bin, but I could not create the libcmt ABI, it was always ahead of the Debian version, so support does not make sense. Sent with Proton Mail secure email. ------- Original Message ------- On Sunday, September 17th, 2023 at 3:30 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for cherrytree-bin [2]: > > This is a badly maintained package. > > Earler, owner updated it to 1.0.0 without adjusting the dependencies > accordingly. > > I left a detailed feedback in a comment, listing all the needed > changes, backing it up with the output of a namcap analysis. > > Then, instead of fixing the dependencies, owner just downgraded the > package to 0.99.37 without bumping the epoch. > > In addition, owner chose to make the PKGBUILD extract the tarball > directly into the $pkgdir, keeping the upstream files' ownership and > access attributes. > > I don't think it is useful to keep this on AUR. > Arch maintainers competently take care of the package for this in > extra repo, which is on the latest upstream version (not even 1.0.0 > but 1.0.1 as of now, released on August 25th, 2023). [a] > > [a]: https://archlinux.org/packages/?q=cherrytree > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/cherrytree-bin/
