Greetings, I suggest you actually examine the PKGBUILD before submitting deletion requests. To address your point, there isn't a standalone Python version '311' either; it's a reference to Python 3.11, which exists in the AUR <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python311> and is quite popular. I followed a similar naming convention here, with the proper naming specified in the provides array.
The idea of merging all dependencies into a single PKGBUILD, simply because it’s possible, is impractical—and I trust I don’t need to explain why. This is especially true for older source trees that may require future patches. The fact that a package currently has only one dependent, just a few days after being uploaded, doesn’t invalidate its existence. Many packages exist without any dependents and are still valuable. My package serves a purpose, and bundling multiple packages into a single one (like cutter-test) is impractical. Furthermore, removing cutter-test would be unreasonable, given the number of packages that depend on it. I am actively reaching out to other maintainers to integrate testing with cutter-test. Best regards, Vitalii On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 4:46 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for gstreamer113 [2]: > > There is no gstreamer version 113 (one hundred and thirteen). > > This package was made for use by one package, cutter-test. > > Please don't duplicate repo packages for such a purpose; build your > specifically needed gstreamer version inline in the cutter-test > PKGBUILD, and install it in a location that is specific to cutter-test > only. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gstreamer113/
