I thought Mike was building the cheating device to beat all other cheating 
devices



> On 29 Jun 2016, at 7:59 PM, Justin Couch <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 29/06/2016 7:42 PM, Mike Borgelt wrote:
>> Peter,
>> 
>> It won't be long before all of gliding is regarded as just a branch of
>> vintage aviation, if it isn't already.
>> I wish it wasn't like that but wishing won't make it so.
> 
> I don't disagree with this point at all, but do want to point out that most 
> activities still have a "sporting" component to it with some rules added to 
> enforce competitiveness - even after the mass market has taken over and 
> turned it into common place. Car/Motorcycle/Boat/etc racing hasn't died out 
> because suddenly everyone can afford to have a car in the driveway. 
> Similarly, Otto's hang gliding hasn't died out because we can fly to Europe 
> in an A380 in a day.
> 
> Once upon a time Formula 1 was pretty much anything goes, now it has a rule 
> book thicker than the local state traffic act - all in the name of 
> competition. Even just a few years ago, the driver was barely more than 
> someone that roughly pointed the car where to go and the computers took 
> control of the details. That got boring and too expensive so now many items 
> of automation have been removed and "standard" components supplied to all 
> competing teams.
> 
> I'm sure the same thing will happen with gliding - greater and greater 
> automation. At some point a halt is called and all competitors are given a 
> "standard flight computer" that is fitted to their cockpit on the grid each 
> morning and removed as soon as possible after landing. This will bring back 
> driver skill into the equation again.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Justin Couch                                 http://www.vlc.com.au/
> Java 3D Graphics Information                    http://www.j3d.org/
> LinkedIn                     http://au.linkedin.com/in/justincouch/
> G+                                                       WetMorgoth
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Look through the lens, and the light breaks down into many lights.
> Turn it or move it, and a new set of arrangements appears... is it
> a single light or many lights, lights that one must know how to
> distinguish, recognise and appreciate? Is it one light with many
> frames or one frame for many lights?"      -Subcomandante Marcos
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Aus-soaring mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to