suggest you ask what is now kept automatically. storage is cheap.
what happened before that was put in place..well it would be history if it had been kept :-) > On 24 Jul 2016, at 9:43 PM, Christopher McDonnell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > ..............lets not go near recording and archival requirements please. > > From: Noel Roediger <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 9:11 PM > To: 'Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.' > <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission > > Hello Emellis. > > I agree totally with your comments. > > I reckon I could post ten questions to GFA exec. related to the formation > and history of our organisation and get no correct answers. > > I’m about to throw a series of questions to Mandy, Terry and Tim in regard to > the importance of recording fact. > > You’ll be included. > > Regards > > Noel. > > From: Aus-soaring [mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of emillis > prelgauskas > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 10:22 AM > To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. > Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission > > This is indicative of the dilemma about corporate knowledge, as each > generation succeeding the one before > only knows what they know, and records that for posterity. > Like the re-imagining of the history of the sport’s formation and early > growth by the late Maurice Little when the current magazine replaced > the several previous iterations; and was published there but which was so > wildly wrong that re-writes and retractions were called for. > > The problem becomes that the record such as an award becomes the permanent > record and is then repeated into the future. > That is why correcting the historical record early in manifest ways is > important. > > Emilis > > > On 23 Jul 2016, at 9:06 pm, Harry <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> I truly believe that overlooking Nigel’s contribution was an unintentional >> oversight. The first I heard of the award was today and I immediately phoned >> Nigel with my concern as to him not being given credit for what he had done. >> I then also emailed an appropriate GFA official suggesting that it might be >> possible to give the award on a joint basis. Was told it might be difficult >> now but that the idea would be put to an subsequent GFA board meeting. For >> the record I investigated the use of Flarms overseas and then approached >> Nigel in the hope he could manufacture them. As much as anyone I respect the >> work Nigel, whom I count upon as a friend, contributes to the gliding >> movement, >> >> Bob, Your concern and support of Nigel is justified and I truly hope the >> omission can be rectified. It is about ten years since Flarms were >> introduced into Australia and peoples memories are not always perfect >> particularly when they were not personally involved, > > > _______________________________________________ > Aus-soaring mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring > <http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring> > _______________________________________________ > Aus-soaring mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring > <http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring>
_______________________________________________ Aus-soaring mailing list [email protected] http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring
