I saw it tonight. With my emergency management background I could see the continuous theme on human factors which culminate at the end. Told in a slightly subdued style to suit the general audience it is intended for. Length felt slightly short for someone in my mindset.
On 13 Sep 2016, at 5:37 pm, Mike Borgelt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>Well you may point out to your son the fact that Sully achieved the only >> >>successful ditching of a commercial airliner in the history of aviation >> >>where not one person was killed and only 5 were injured. >> >> Yes, but as he said, isn't that what they are paid for? But by the >> above accounts, that's not what the film is about. > > I saw the film on Sunday morning with Carol, a couple who are friends, their > 15 year old son and their son in law. > All thought it was a good movie. > > In the movie, the NTSB conflict wasn't actually emphasised too much and when > faced with the real evidence they readily backed down instead of ignoring it. > > My only criticism of the movie is that the timeline is a little disjointed. I > think it could have been told linearly. But that would be second guessing Mr > Eastwood and I'm not feeling that lucky. > > In the actual NTSB report note the slightly dissenting opinion on a couple of > points of the BEA (French equivalent of NTSB). One might almost think they > were trying to protect Airbus.:-) _______________________________________________ Aus-soaring mailing list [email protected] http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring
