A year ago about this time when taking our chute into PA for a repack they
told me the harness was faded beyond acceptance and they would not do a repack.
It was a PA outer, approximately 25 years old with a second-hand canopy that
had been provided by Rory at Bankstown some time previously and which had
about two years left in it on estimation. So PA's policy is not a new one
this year.

We decided to buy a new slimpack from Beryl Hartley - one of the Czech "Mars"
imports. Yes, there had previously been a certification issue and yes, it
had to have a local repack (which was done at no cost before we purchased
it). It's been comfortable in service and this year PA did the repack on
it without comment (and, I might add, at a slightly lower price than in previous
years).

Leigh Youdale
VH-GQF

>-- Original Message --
>Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 01:04:41 +1100
>To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
>       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: Mike Cleaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Parachute Service Bulletin
>Reply-To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
>       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>At 01:47 06-11-03 +1100, you wrote:
>>Ken,
>>I found out today that Parachutes Australia have issued a Service Bulletin
>
>>(No.PA SB9502 Rev 2) which lifes their containers,harness and canopies
for
>
>>the types listed, at  20yrs. The list includes most types which we 
>>normally use in gliders, including the slimpacks and thinbacks. If the

>>equipment has exceeded that time, it is to be taken out of service.
>>We have 8 which are suddenly of no use, and I suspect many other clubs
are
>
>>in a similar situation.
>>
>>I don't recall seeing any advice on this matter and note that the bulletin
>
>>distribution did not include GFA, although I was told "someone at GFA 
>>office"was informed.
>>
>>As there is a requirement to have a serviceable parachute for comps, this
>
>>may affect some entrants to this years events.
>>Forwarded for your information.
>>Regards
>>Glenn Mclean
>
>Glenn
>
>I provided this information in an off-line reply to someone who asked about
>
>parachutes in September:
>
>         "Not an answer to your question - but you should take a look at
>
>the latest Service Bulletin on the Parachutes Australia web site. Effective
>
>from the next repack, Slimpack and Thinback harness and container systems
>
>are to be brought back from an "on-condition" life to a 20-year replacement
>
>due to likely deterioration of the fabric and webbing. The same applies

>also to the 26' taffeta parachute canopies, but not the the LoPo and the
>
>other common canopy packed in the low-sped parachutes - these remain 
>"on-condition".
>
>"CASA will doubtless issue an AD to back up this SB very soon: the APF have
>
>already issued an updated Rigging Advisory Circular.
>
>"Given that these have been lifed beyond 20 years for about the past 8 
>years, I can see a lot of containers suddenly needing replacement."
>
>
>AS you can see (and it's on the PA web page) the problem is the container
>
>systems and not necessarily the parachutes inside them.  If you have the
>
>taffeta canopy, it will fail its next inspection if it was manufactured

>before December 1983.  I guess there are a few that have reached this 
>20-year point since the life was made "on conditions" in about 1996 - so
>
>perhaps we should be grateful for the extra life we gained from them since
>
>this date.
>
>The complete rig would cost between $2000 and $2600 for a new one, 
>depending on design, but if you buy a LoPo canopy (or already have one)
its
>
>life is not limited by time alone in the future, but only by how well you
>
>have looked after it.  Ideally it should either be sitting in its carry

>bag, or on your back being sat upon - but I know several that get taken
out
>
>of the bag in the clubhouse in the morning and then left on a wing tip all
>day!
>
>We checked our club parachutes and have at least one container to replace,
>
>maybe two (I could not find the manufacture date of the second one and it
>
>was sent of to our packer to check .
>
>However, some newer European parachutes were grounded earlier this year

>when people discovered the manufacturer's Certificate of Approval had 
>expired.  They have since been able to be put back into service following
>
>re-certification of the maker, but needed an inspection first.  You can

>just about throw the harness away after 20 years, but there is some hope
>of 
>an on-condition extension for taffeta canopies as the limitation was 
>imposed because of a lack of information rather than known deterioration.
>
>Wombat
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Aus-soaring mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to