WRT spinning fatalities,

Preamble:
=============
Mike Borgelt cites examples of experienced pilots being killed in spin
accidents, but why? (Also let's not forget that terrible inflight break up
of a Blanik that entered a spiral dive after recovery from a spin due to
possible failure to recognise recovery, although the true facts may never be
known, please refer to http://www.gfa.org.au/Docs/ops/opsadvice0197.pdf).

Impressions of the Puch (from a non-Puch pilot!!!!!):
===================================================
I have never flown a Puch, but a brief internet research divides people into
the:
(for example
http://www.aviation-forum.com/gliders/Unintentional_fullydeveloped_spins_119
182.html
http://www.aviation-forum.com/gliders/Puch_spin_in_118650.html)


1) The Puch will recover from a spin when correct spin recovery technique is
used (the recovery may take time, but the spin will recover)

2) The Puch is an unpredictable and potentially dangerous (if not fatal)
machine to spin.

It is enlightening to hear people's experiences in the Puch on this list.

It may never be known if the spin fatalities followed normal spin recovery
techniques, although one assumes that if experienced pilots have been killed
something is wrong, however even experienced pilots make mistakes through
complacency.

Where to from here?
===================
The key lies in active research and correct training.

Research:
========
Some people on the aus-soaring list have asked whether spin training
actually saves lives (and possibly that more people have died in spin
training than actually been saved from an unintentional spin). All this is
anecdotal.

Facts would need to be gathered and statistical analysis would need to be
applied before people can start making general statements about the impact
of spin training, although no doubt there are many individual stories about
recovering from an unintentional spin. Converting this to statistics is
actually quite difficult because it would rely upon objective reporting of a
subjective event!

Also would anyone be prepared to cease spin training and see if the spin
fatality rate rises (a example of a case-control study!) I suspect not.

Training:
========
What and how we train should be based on research (i.e facts and data).

The aim of spin recovery is to first recognise that a spin (incipient or
fully developed) has occurred and to recover from the spin with minimum
height loss.

My hypothesis (based on experience) of situations where an unintentional
fully developed spin are more likely (although I would need to find data to
research this!!!):

1) Turning after a winch launch failure before safe airspeed is reached.

2) Failure to recognise and recover from an incipient spin before it reaches
the fully developed stage (i.e. whilst thermalling or on outlanding).

A plan to prevent these situations:

1) Reinforce from day 1 the importance of safe speed near the ground (unless
flaring ;-)). Theoretically this is the best insurance against unintentional
spinning. I call this a "non negotiable item of flying". Rule of primacy
(i.e. the first fact learned often sticks)

2) Teaching pilots to recognise the situations that are likely to lead to an
incipient spin (i.e. sloppy thermalling, slow poorly co-ordinated turns
whilst outlanding). i.e. develop an internal system of checks and a sense of
urgency to correct a situation before it develops too far.

3) Teaching pilots the symptoms of the incipient spin and the correct prompt
recovery actions to minimse height loss. All the glider types I have flown
can do incipient spins (see P.S.). This is the crux of preventing spin
accidents.

4) And then only after the first three points have been understood fully
should training regarding full spin recovery be instituted.

Of course this would all need to be supported by data and research!!!! ;-)

M.T.

P.S.
I have flown various numbers of gliders (i.e. Bocian 1E, Bergfalke, ES59
Arrow, Super Arrow, Club Libelle, Standard Libelle, Pik 20D, Grob G103, Grob
G102, Hornet, Discus, Boomerang, IS28, PW5, Ventus, Janus, Short Wing
Kookaburra, ASK21, Long Wing Kookaburra) and all go through the incipient
spin stage before becoming fully developed. Many of these types and go to
incipient spin stage and either self recover or degenerate into a spiral
dive. It would seem that the incipient spin stage is a crucial point (i.e
all gliders are capable of going incipient). However are there gliders that
go straight into a fully developed spin without a noticeable incipient
stage? Private replies preferred.

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to