Hi Graeme!

I was starting to feel like I was pushing this thread too hard
and now you have made it all worthwhile - THANKS! Lot's of good
advice consolidating snippets from elsewhere, adding valuable new
info - but most importantly coming from a glider
pilot/optometrist.

"Unless your optometrist is made aware of your special needs, you
will be unhappy with your new specs". Wow! does this sum up many
of our experiences!! I know I'll be armed with a side photo and
distances when I next visit an optometrist!

"From a personal perspective, I find that lower tech trifocals
work well for me, allowing clear distance, intermediate and close
vision without any distortion, but some people will find that the
simple bifocal will cover all their needs, particularly if they
are under 50."
Graeme, I am interested to know if it is necessary for the image
to 'jump' as it is presented to the eye form one bi/tri region to
the next? EG when driving with mine and glancing at the
speedometer (which I can read adequately from either lens - but
the line seems to fall naturally though the middle . . ) I have
to look in 'two different places' as my head moves just a bit. Is
this a fact of physics or does the lens maker have control over
this sort of thing?

Thanks again.

Cheers,

Jim Kelly






----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Graeme Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Discussion of
issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] re: Best sunglasses for gliding?


Thanks for the welcome Jim.

I practice in Sydney and fly at Narromine. You are on the right
track when
you measured your map & instrument distances. Most refraction
(eye testing)
is done with the premise that reading is done at 40cm. so the
additional
power in the lower section of a multifocal is calculated using
that distance
and the residual focussing ability (accommodation)  of the
individual's
eyes, which decreases with advancing maturity. This is fine for
most
activities but there are some which don't fit the pattern,
particularly some
sports and some unusual occupations. Unless your optometrist is
made aware
of your special needs, you will be unhappy with your new specs.

As well as the critical distances you mentioned, the angle of
your head
relative to the instruments is important. While nothing is as
good as having
your optometrist measuring everything while you are strapped into
the
cockpit, a side on photograph will give him (or her) an idea of
what you
need, how to place the optical centres, and the type of lens
which would
work for you. Incidentally, the term multifocal means any lens
with more
than one focal distance, although it is loosely applied
specifically to
progressive power lenses.

>From a personal perspective, I find that lower tech trifocals
work well for
me, allowing clear distance, intermediate and close vision
without any
distortion, but some people will find that the simple bifocal
will cover all
their needs, particularly if they are under 50.

If  you "must have" a specific tint in your glasses, just like
Joe Blow's,
try and separate them from Joe long enough to let your
optometrist put them
in his spectral analyser, if he has one, so that a reasonable
match can be
obtained. They are not 100% accurate but a darn sight more
objective than
holding the lens over a bit of white paper.

I know that there are other optometrist pilots out there and
these are the
professionals who will be attuned to your needs as they will have
had to
solve the problems for themselves.

Good luck in your search!

Graeme



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 12:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] re: Best sunglasses for gliding?


> Thanks very much Graeme,
>
> I suspect that you are just one of many lurkers out there!!
>
> Thanks for your professional comments.
> Perhaps you could also be so kind as to point us in the
> direction of what questions to ask our optometrist when we next
> visit so that we get the best script possible for safety and
> success?!! EG I've thought to measure the distance from my eyes
> to the panel, and to a map.
> Is there a clever way to define the position of the bi/trifocal
> edges
> from our weird prone seating position?? Etc.
> IE How can WE help YOU to get it right??
>
> And why not tell us which suburb/city you service? You might
> get
> an offline email for exact details - it is in all of our
> interests to
> improve the safety of our sport and an optometrist that knows
> our issues has to be an asset!
>
> Any other professionals lurking out there - please join in -
> let's get the facts on the table and wrap up this thread with
> some good advice/conclusions and get up there flying again
> (with new sunglasses of course) ;-).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jim Kelly
> Melbourne.
>
>
>
>
>
>


_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to