On Fri, 20 May 2005 13:00:03 +0930, Mark Newton wrote:
>what are the state associations for?)
>(... I'm sure Emilis will answer that question :-)

Happy to try.
There appear to be different emphases in different regions.
In some they have indeed been merged into GFA, in some they stand as 
independent legal entities operating both as themselves and as a 
regional committee of GFA.
Depends on how you see an administrative structure working. To the 
incumbent GFA President's own words, it can be a top down driven 
organisation where edicts issued from on high are faithfully 
promoted, cajoled and enforced by the individual pilot/club/region 
representatives who are told what to pass on.
Others see the region as a useful level for collective experience in 
the neighbouring clubs to be shared; in this case the state officers 
are the faces accessible to those clubs and their pilots. In this 
realm, the interaction is by mutual respect and consensus.
There seems to be something of a tension between these quite 
different world views in the currently dysfunctional federal 
organisation.
The current initiatives to force payment from clubs, restructure the 
federal processes (again) this time without plebescite or Articles 
change may all be an attempt to cure the disparate views into the one 
top end view of the world.

>The change in focus of modern communication is reflected in the way
>that you believe the GFA officers should be answering directly to
>you,
>instead of via your state association (which is how the system was
>designed, remember?).  

The current system actually is GFA:individual pilot. In that change 
from the original connected hierarchy there were some items missed, 
like how clubs and regions now fit.
Possibly Robert has found as others have that in asking clubs and 
regions the questions, they don't know the answers, because they too 
have been left out of the communication loop.
There is also the issue of individual tensions when a regional 
representative is told to sell, cajole or threaten a path of action 
from the top end which the rep happened to disagree with/vote 
against/oppose.

Tough, this human stuff, isn't it.



_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to